Today, I messed around with a high-end replica of a Rolex GMT-Master II. I’ve always been curious about these things, so I finally got my hands on one to see what the hype is all about.
First thing I did was to check the hands on the watch. I read somewhere that on real Rolexes, the hands are stacked in a specific order: Hour, GMT, then Minute. So, I grabbed the replica and took a close look. Sure enough, the hands were in the correct order. That was a good start, I guess.
Next, I started playing around with the watch, setting the time and messing with the GMT function. It felt pretty smooth, to be honest. The bezel clicked nicely, and the crown screwed down without any issues. I was kind of surprised at how solid it felt, considering it’s not the real deal.
- I wound the watch up, and it started ticking away.
- I set the time and then tried to adjust the GMT hand.
- It moved independently, just like it’s supposed to.
I spent a good hour just fiddling with the watch, comparing it to pictures of genuine Rolex GMT-Master IIs online. Honestly, the details on this replica were pretty impressive. I wanted to find the serial number, but unfortunately I wasn’t able to locate it this time, maybe I’ll try it next time.
While I was at it, I did some digging online about affordable alternatives to the Rolex GMT-Master. I stumbled upon some articles mentioning watches like the Tudor Black Bay GMT and the Tissot Seastar 1000 GMT. They seem like decent options for folks who want the GMT function without breaking the bank. I might have to check those out sometime.
At the end of the day, I have to say, this replica Rolex was way better than I expected. It’s not something I’d personally wear, but I can see why some people are drawn to them. It’s like getting a taste of the luxury watch world without having to sell a kidney. Still, nothing beats the real thing, I bet. But for now, this little experiment satisfied my curiosity.
Click to consult